Legal Opinion
Huus v. Huus
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 1947No. File 7050PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
January 18, 1928, the defendants gave Ex. 1, their promissory note for $100 to one Sven A. Huus who sold it to the plaintiff. The note recites: “Nov 1st 28 after date we no promise to pay to the order of Sven A. Huns One Hundred. .- 100 Dollars at 5% Int.”
In 1940 there was some correspondence between the plaintiff and the defendant Theo. Huus, regarding Ex. 1, and on December 5, 1940, Huus wrote to the plaintiff Ex. 2, as follows:
“Received your letter some time ago which was delayed.
Was sure surprised the other day to receive a letter from Attorney Swenseid of Stanley and summoned a day after
I…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Leffek v. LuedemanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Paine v. DoddsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Pierce v. SeymourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Sutherland v. MacLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of Nevada v. FriedmanNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Pear v. Grand Forks Motel AssociatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Regan Farmers Union Cooperative v. HinkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Wipf v. BlakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947