Legal Opinion
Steinkamp v. Jacque
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 3, 1979No. File CV-H-7904-40-HDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpada, J.
This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks damages from her former landlord for unlawful entry, detainer and conversion. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that no bond for prosecution was provided.
The plaintiff, on April 5, 1979, filed an application for waiver of fees and payment of costs. On April 9, 1979, this court ex parte, found that the plaintiff was indigent and ordered all fees, costs and the bond for prosecution waived. The plaintiff’s sole source of income is derived from the Connecticut department of income maintenance. The defendant’s request on April…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Meltzer v. C. Buck LeCraw & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Conover v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Bloch v. UllmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Loughery v. Commissioner of Corrections, No. Cv 01-0812161s (Jul. 9, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002