Legal Opinion
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 30, 1971PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff, the Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, hereinafter referred to as Algonquin, is a pipeline company authorized under General Statutes § 16-263 to construct and operate pipelines, compressor stations, appliances and other appurtenant equipment within the state of Connecti cut. Although not admitted in its answer, the defendant zoning hoard of appeals for the city of Meriden, hereinafter called the board, acknowledges, in its brief, that Algonquin is a public service company. General Statutes § 16-1 specifically defines a public service company as including a pipeline company and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Little v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Wilson Point Property Owners Assn. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Mad River Co. v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- P. X. Restaurant, Inc. v. Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Pollack v. GampelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.