Legal Opinion

Bloch v. Ullman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 19, 2016No. AC37847Published

1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.

The self-represented plaintiff, Robert M. Bloch, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendant attorneys, Andrew Ullman and Irving Perlmutter, on the ground that he failed to file a recognizance bond as required by General Statutes (Rev. to 2013) § 52-185. 1 The issue on appeal, as succinctly stated by the defendants, 2 is whether a judgment of dismissal properly entered against the plaintiff on December 9, 2014, when he failed to comply with the November 24, 2014 order of the court, Wilson, J., that he file a recognizance bond for costs in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyles v. PrestonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Gemmell v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Gianetti v. Connecticut Newspapers Publishing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Steinkamp v. JacqueConnecticut Superior Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API