Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Huntley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

Peyton Johnson and wife, in February, 1877, mortgaged land, including a mill and its appurtenances, to Kennedy and Robertson, to secure several notes payable to-them, and made by Peyton Johnson. These notes became-the property of the appellant Hamilton, by endorsement.

The same grantors, in February, 1878, mortgaged the same-land to the appellant Hamilton, to secure a note payable to him and made by Peyton Johnson.

Hamilton brought suit upon the notes and mortgages and obtained a judgment of foreclosure against Johnson and wife.-

Thereupon the appellees, Huntley, Holcomb and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Voorhis v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Walker v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Ætna Insurance v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Lyon v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eve v. LouisIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hedderich v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Parker Land & Improvement Co. v. ReddickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Bass Foundry & Machine Works v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Dutton v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API