Parker Land & Improvement Co. v. Reddick
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Robinson, J. —
The agreed statement of facts in this case, was, in substance, as follows: Appellee, Red-dick, on January 1,1896, was engaged in the manufacture and sale of wooden tanks at Montpelier, Indiana, where he operated a shop for such purposes. In the manufacture of large tanks all the parts used are completed ready to put together at said shop, except making the iron hoops, and are shipped to the point as material, and when received at the place of use the tank *617is put together with the use of oakum and pitch, and hoops are made and placed thereon; on January 14, 1896, the appellant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Mays v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Caulfield v. PolkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Hamilton v. HuntleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stearns-Roger Manufacturing Co. v. Aztec Gold Mining & Milling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1908
- Dinsmore v. Lake Elec. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- McFarlane v. FoleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dutton v. EnsleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Reeves v. York Engineering & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.