Legal Opinion

Dutton v. Ensley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1898No. 2,516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From tbe Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellee was plaintiff below, and sued appellant for the alleged wrongful conversion of a certáin frame dwelling house. The issue was joined by a general denial, trial by the court, special finding of facts made, conclusions of law thereon, and judgment for appellee. The court found that appellee, on *47the 9th day of October, 1889, was the owner of the W. J of the S. E. ¿ of section 7, township 30, range 2 W., in Pulaski county, Indiana; that on said day she executed a mortgage on said land, her husband joining her, to the state of Indiana, to secure a school fund loan for $ — ; that with a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Meigs's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  4. Seymour v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Parker Land & Improvement Co. v. ReddickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. White v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. McFarlane v. FoleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Jahnke v. JahnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Menzenberger v. American State Bank, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API