Legal Opinion
Weiss v. Temporary Investment Fund, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 27, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-230PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
This is a shareholder’s derivative action brought on behalf of a money market fund against the fund’s investment adviser, its underwriter, and certain members of the fund’s board of directors. In an Opinion and Order dated June 17, 1981, 516 F.Supp. 665, the Court dismissed the complaint for failure to satisfy the demand on directors requirement of Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On June 26,1981, plaintiff filed a motion for reargument, which presented three issues for reconsideration by the Court. The first point raised was a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,345 Anita B. Brody v. Chemical Bank, and Pennsylvania CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Markowitz v. BrodyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Stanley M. Grossman v. Edward C. Johnson, 3rdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Abbey v. Computer & Communications Technology Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1983
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.