Legal Opinion
Stanley M. Grossman v. Edward C. Johnson, 3rd
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 29, 1982No. 81-1348PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Stanley M. Grossman brought this derivative action in the District Court for Massachusetts, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-1 et seq. (1976) (the Act). 1 He is and has been a shareholder of Fidelity Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (“the Fund”), a registered open-end investment company, and he sues the Fund’s investment adviser, Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR”), the corporation that is the sole owner of that adviser (“FMR Corp.”), the affiliated directors of the Fund, as well as most of the unaffiliated directors…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- In Re Sonus Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.