Legal Opinion

Shalom Baby-Wear, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 7, 1965No. C.D. 2542Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This is a protest against the classification and assessment of additional duty on certain imported merchandise referred to herein as “Boston Bags.” Three different articles are involved — a two-piece child’s pajama, a small airline kit bag, referred to as a “Boston Bag,” and a tag on which is designed a sketch of the pajama with the words “NIGHT FLIGHT TWO PIECE PAJAMA -warn [sic] napped flannelette STYLED TO FIT.” The pajama, the bag, and the tag were marked plaintiff’s exhibits 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Normally, the tag is attached by a string to the bag. The words “ALISTO…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. HohnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Julliard Fancy Foods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. United States v. Yamamoto & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API