Legal Opinion

Gasser v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1988No. Nos. 33-84L, 177-84LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This is a suit for compensation based upon the fifth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiffs, owners of property interests in Baja California, Mexico, allege that the construction and operation of Hoover Dam and Glen Canyon Dam in the United States resulted in a substantially reduced flow of water in the Colorado River, causing the development of a sediment blockage below their properties. They allege that the river has either directly overflowed their land, or caused elevated groundwater conditions, resulting in the taking of a permanent flowage…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. Leeth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Vaizburd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Gasser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API