Turner v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, the present and former owners of riparian farmland, seek compensation under the Fifth Amendment1 for damages resulting from the flooding of their property. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. Because plaintiffs’ suit lacks essential elements of a flood-related taking claim, it is concluded that defendant’s motion should be granted.
I
Plaintiffs’ lands are situated in Itawam-ba County, Mississippi. A creek known as the Twenty Mile Channel flows in a southeasterly direction through the plaintiffs’ lands and empties into the Tombigbee River…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neal Turner, Jimmy Crane, Johnny Crane, and Edwin Jerry Wilburn v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Seiler v. City of NorwalkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012