Legal Opinion
Vaizburd v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2003No. 00-136LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs seek compensation for a physical taking resulting from the deposition of sand on their property, which they attribute to actions of the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Trial was held in New York City from April 8-14, 2003. Plaintiffs, Arkady and Linda Vaizburd, appear pro se.1 After trial, plaintiffs filed a motion to reopen the record to include new information and to impose sanctions against defendant. For the reasons set out below, we reopen the record for the limited purpose of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Linda Vaizburd and Arkady Vaizburd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Vaizburd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Prakhin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Linda Vaizburd and Arkady Vaizburd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Linda Vaizburd and Arkady Vaizburd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.