Legal Opinion

Halvorson v. B&F Fastener Supply

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 2017No. A16-0920Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

This appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) requires us to determine when, and under what circumstances, an employer may terminate an employee’s rehabilitation benefits. Relying on the definition of “qualified employee” in an administrative rule, the compensation judge concluded that an employee was no longer eligible for rehabilitation benefits because she had obtained “suitable gainful employment.” See Minn. R. 5220.0100, subps. 22, 34 (2015). The WCCA reversed, holding that an employer must show “good cause” before terminating rehabilitation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Conga Corporation, d/b/a Conga Latin Bistro v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API