Mull v. Jones
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jackson District Court. ActioN by Mull & Son against Jones, as garnishee, to recover $80.35. Trial at the March Term, 1884, and judgment for defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
On the 28th day of September, 1882, the plaintiffs, Charles L. Mull & Son, obtained a judgment before a justice of the peace of Jackson county, against one W. A. Brown, for the sum of $60.85. An execution was issued thereon, and returned unsatisfied. On the 14th day of November, 1883, the plaintiffs made and filed with said justice the required affidavit, and caused a notice in garnishment to issue to A. L. McDowell, T. P. Moore, and the defendant herein, Ed. F. Jones, commanding them to appear and answer all questions touching their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hixon v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Pierce v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Board of Education v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Moore v. C., R. I. &. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RaglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SharittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Freeman v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MaltbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Woods v. Amulco Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.