Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
ERROR to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Neville, J. cited: B. & M. It. It. v. Thompson, 1 Pac. Rep., 622. Mooney v. U. T. It. It., 14 N. W. R., 343. Conley v. Chileote, 25 Ohio State, 320. cited: Pwndt v. 'Clary, 13 Neb., 407. Fitzgerald v. Hollingsworth, 14 Neb., 188. Pierce v. C. & N. W. R. R., 36 Wis., 288. Thompson’s Exemptions, §§ 833, 838. Jones v. Comings, 6 N. H., 497.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This action was brought before a justice of the peace by the plaintiff against one L. N. Kintz, to recover judgment on an account assigned to the plaintiff. An affidavit for an •attachment was made and filed upon the ground that Kintz was a non-resident of this state, and an order of attachment and notice of garnishment served on the defendant. The defendant thereupon filed an answer as follows:
“Now comes the said Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., and for its answer as garnishee says:
1st. That L. N. Kintz had due him, at the time of the service of the garnishee process in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tingley v. BatemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Den v. HuffTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- Farmers & Citizens' Bank v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
- Mineral Point Railroad v. BarronIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Bell v. Western River Imp. & Wrecking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- State Ex Rel. Lankford v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McIntosh v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Bingenheimer Mercantile Co. v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Kestler v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.