Legal Opinion

Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Ragland

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam:

This case originated before a justice of the peace of McLean county, and was taken by appeal to the circuit court, where a judgment was recovered in favor of appellee, against appellant, to reverse which this appeal is taken.

The only question presented by the record is this: Does the law require a party who is garnisheed, as was appellant, to disclose the fact that his creditor was the head of a family, and claim for him the benefit of the exemption allowed by law.

Section 14, chap. 62, title, “Garnishment,” provides, that the wages and services of a defendant, being the head of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. McClunIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Winterfield v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WhipskerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mull v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Rumbold v. Supreme Council Royal LeagueIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API