Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Co. v. Walter Snyder Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Company against the Walter Snyder Company and others. Sur motion to strike out counterclaim.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKTNSON, District Judge.
The question involved in this case is the scope and meaning of equity rule No. 30 (201 Fed. v, 118 C. C. A. v). There is a sharply contested controversial field which this rule covers. The controversy may be said to have begun over the practice of special pleading and the question of the abolition of that system of practice. The advocates of the one system dwell upon the advantages of the logical development of the law as a science; the advocates of the other keep in mind the doing of justice in each particular case under all its special facts and circumstances. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Buffalo Specialty Co. v. VancleefDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
- Adamson v. ShalerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1913
- Christensen v. Westinghouse Traction Brake Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- Cooling Tower Co. v. C. F. Braun & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Parker Pen Co. v. Rex Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1926
- Utilities Service, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
- Flowers v. Magor Car Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1928