Buffalo Specialty Co. v. Vancleef
District Court, N.D. Illinois
In Equity. Suit by the Buffalo Specialty Company against Noah Vancleef and others. On motions by defendant for injunction and a reference.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
This is an application by defendants for an injunction, based on defendants’ counterclaim and affidavits, restraining plaintiff from making false representations concerning the order or decree of August 7, 1914, dismissing the bill for want of equity, with costs, and from interfering with defendants’ business of making and selling “Neverleak Tire Fluid.” They also ask a reference to a master to ascertain the profits and damages they claim to be entitled to, as prayed in their counterclaim.
The bill, which was dismissed, alleged infringement of a trade-mark and unfair…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913
- Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
- Adamson v. ShalerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Clifton v. TombCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Lion Mfg. Corporation v. Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.