Legal Opinion
Cooling Tower Co. v. C. F. Braun & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1924No. 4221PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
This is a case in which both the plaintiff and the defendant appeal from the decree of the court below. The plaintiff sued the defendant for infringement of letters patent No. 1,010,020, issued November 28, 1911, to Mitehell-Tappen Company as assignee of Barton H. Coffey, for improvements in ‘/devices for cooling liquids.” The patent relates to an art which is old, and as to which numerous prior devices had been invented and patented for cooling water by atmospheric action. In the cooling operation the water to be cooled is delivered at the top of an open tower having a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
- Wire Wheel Corp. of America v. Budd Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- Paramount Hosiery Form Drying Co. v. Walter Snyder Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- In Re NathanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- Frankart, Inc. v. Metal Lamp CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.