Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Equity. Suit by the Terry Steam Turbine Company against the B. F. Sturtevant Compatiy. On motion by defendant for leave to file supplemental answdr.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff’s hill charges the defendant with infringement of United States patents 741,385 and 793,857, to Edward C. Terry, both for improvements in steam turbines. It asks for an injunction and an account. It was filed March 4, 1912. The case was at issue in June, 1912. The plaintiff’s testimony has been taken, the defendant’s is not yet completed. There have been no orders of court limiting the time for taking testimony on either side.
The new equity rules of the Supreme Court having gone into effect, thd defendant now asks leave to file a supplemental answer, which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stuart v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Stuart v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Stonemetz Printers' Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding-Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1891
- Jackson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
3Cited by18 opinions
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Electric Boat Co. v. Lake Torpedo Boat Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913
- Buffalo Specialty Co. v. VancleefDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- Adamson v. ShalerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.