Legal Opinion
Marotta v. Road Carrier Local 707 Welfare Fund
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 16, 2000No. CV 98-6642 (MLO)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Jack F. Marotta (“plaintiff’ or “Marotta”) brings this action against defendant Road Carrier Local 707 Welfare Fund (“defendant” or the “Welfare Fund”), alleging that the Welfare Fund violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, (“ERISA”), Section 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), when defendant failed to provide plaintiff with health insurance coverage for his spouse, whom plaintiff married approximately one year after he retired. Defendant moves the Court for an order granting summary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Santori v. Met LifeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Falcone v. Teamsters Health and Welfare FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Vail v. Plumbers, Pipe Fitters & Apprentices Local Number 112 Pension FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001