Vail v. Plumbers, Pipe Fitters & Apprentices Local Number 112 Pension Fund
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION & ORDER
McAVOY, District Judge.
Plaintiff T. Edward Vail commenced the instant action pursuant to section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), contending that he did not incur a break in service and, thus, is entitled to additional benefits under his pension plan (the “plan”). Plaintiff seeks a money judgment for the difference between the benefits that has received to date and the amount of benefits to which he claims he is entitled based upon a recalculation of benefits excluding any break in service.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martha Kinstler v. First Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- John Carey v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 363 Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Miles v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund Employee Pension Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Roman v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Jeffrey A. Walker v. David JastremskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.