Legal Opinion

Falcone v. Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2007No. 06-5112, Civil Action No. 06-5112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund’s (the Fund) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 2). In response to Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff Mary Falcone has filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.

There are two central issues in this case. One, whether a claim for reinstatement of health benefits under an ERISA fund is statutory or contractual in nature. If the Court determines that Plaintiffs claim is statutory, then Plaintiff is free to proceed with a suit in this Court, without first…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Monica M. Zipf v. American Telephone and Telegraph CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Nick J. D'Amico Cliff Hollihan Joseph G. Muto Kevin Beam v. CBS Corporation, F/k/a Westinghouse, Inc the Westinghouse Electric Company Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cement Mason's Union Local No. 592 Pension Fund v. ZapponeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. DIGREGORIO v. TRIVIUM PACKAGING COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API