Legal Opinion

Hemmer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1936No. 29654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Plaintiff brought action for total and permanent disability under the terms of a group insurance policy issued to the employees of defendant company. Defendant filed demurrer to the amended petition, which demurrer was sustained, from which ruling the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff was an employee in the Omaha office of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and was eligible to participate in a policy of group insurance in said company. Such insurance took effect April 1, 1929, when he began his employment as their agent. He was unable to continue his duties on June 24, 1933, because of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hamblin v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. JearyNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Thull v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Seavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Uptegrove v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Exstrum v. Union Casualty and Life Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hemmer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Exstrum v. UNION CASUALTY AND LIFE INSURANCE CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Exstrum v. Union Casualty & Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API