Legal Opinion

Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1985No. C3-84-969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for appellant-contractor’s negligent construction of a porch addition to respondent’s home. The contractor counterclaimed for the balance due on the contract. The jury found the contractor negligent in the design or construction of the addition and assessed $7,000 in damages. The contractor appeals from a denial of its motion for a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1979 respondent Lenore Fudally and her now-deceased husband contracted with appellant Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. (Ching Johnson), a remodeling contracting company, to build a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Children's Broadcasting Corporation v. The Walt Disney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. M.M. Silta, Inc. v. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  3. Children's Broadcasting Corporation v. The Walt Disney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. Children's Broadcasting Corp. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Children's Broadcasting Corp. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API