Legal Opinion
Crockett v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 23, 2003No. CIV. 00-2260 (RJL)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
LEON, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by Defendants, the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) and the District of Columbia (“D.C.”). After due consideration of the parties’ submissions and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the Court concludes that the plaintiff could not as a matter of law establish that MPD violated his due process rights. Accordingly, the Court grants the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
I. Background
Steven Crockett (“Crockett”), a former employee of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Kelley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Scott v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.