Legal Opinion
Kelley v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2014PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The plaintiffs are Toledo R. Kelley and Anthony Conrad, two former police officers whose employment with the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) was terminated. They bring suit against the District of Columbia, Chief of Police Cathy Lanier, and the former Attorney General of the District of Columbia, Peter Nickles. Lanier and Nickles are sued in both their official and individual capacities. The plaintiffs assert…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kingman Park Civic Association v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Alemu v. Dep't of For-Hire VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lattisaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States Ex Rel. Scollick v. NarulaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.