Legal Opinion

Johnson v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 21, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-0250(RCL)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ Motion [5] to Dismiss. Upon consideration of the defendants’ motion, the opposition thereto, the reply brief, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the defendants’ motion will be granted. The Court agrees with the defendants’ contention that five of the plaintiffs six causes of action fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted because the plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to those five claims. The Court’s reasoning…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Bonaccorsy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Lockhart v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Johnson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API