Legal Opinion
Amsden v. Fischer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 20, 2001No. AC 19452PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Richard Fischer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Loomis Amsden, rendered after a jury trial in this medical malpractice action. The defendant claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) excluded the testimony of his expert witness on the issue of causation, (2) refused to instruct the jury on intervening cause and (3) failed to direct a verdict in his favor or to set aside the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Sturdivant v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gold v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- MacHado v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.