Texas City Metal Trades Council v. Union Carbide Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Texas City Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO (“Plaintiff’ or “the Union”) and Defendant Union Carbide Corporation (“Defendant” or “the Company”) each seek summary judgment in this lawsuit brought by the Union to enforce the arbitration provisions of the collective bargaining agreement between the Parties. For the reasons stated below, the Union’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby respectfully DENIED, and the Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.