Legal Opinion

State v. Rolfe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 2020No. A165455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

461 Argued and submitted March 26, 2019, reversed and remanded June 3, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TANYA FAITH ROLFE, Defendant-Appellant. Benton County Circuit Court 16CR32503; A165455

468 P3d 503

At the start of defendant’s jury trial for violating a stalking protective order (SPO), ORS 163.750, the state’s theory of the case was that defendant sent the vic- tim a message two days after being served notice of the SPO. Defendant testified that she sent the message before receiving notice, and defense counsel argued in closing that the jury should acquit for that reason.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. AshkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HeineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. CamphouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. Trenary-BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API