Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jefferson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2004PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BECK, J.:

¶ 1 The question we address is whether a police officer’s observation of an individual in a high crime area, coupled with that individual’s prompt flight upon observing the officer, combine to establish reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, thereby permitting a Terry1 stop. Based on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in In the Interest of D.M., 566 Pa. 445, 781 A.2d 1161 (2001) (D.M.II), we are compelled to conclude that a Terry stop is warranted under such circumstances and, further, no violation of the state constitution occurs when such a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. In the Interest of J.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API