Commonwealth v. Jefferson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BECK, J.:
¶ 1 The question we address is whether a police officer’s observation of an individual in a high crime area, coupled with that individual’s prompt flight upon observing the officer, combine to establish reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot, thereby permitting a Terry1 stop. Based on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in In the Interest of D.M., 566 Pa. 445, 781 A.2d 1161 (2001) (D.M.II), we are compelled to conclude that a Terry stop is warranted under such circumstances and, further, no violation of the state constitution occurs when such a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In the Interest of J.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.