Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2001PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

We originally issued an opinion in this matter on December 27, 1999, wherein we held that a police officer did not possess the requisite cause to stop appellant pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. In the Interest of D.M., 560 Pa. 166, 743 A.2d 422 (1999)(hereinafter “D.M.”). The United States Supreme Court issued a per curiam order vacating our prior decision and remanding the case for further consideration in light of its opinion in Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 120 S.Ct. 673,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API