Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2006PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Thomas Brown appeals the judgment of sentence for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (PWID) on grounds that: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress; and 2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. 1 We affirm.

¶ 2 “Our standard of review in addressing a challenge to a trial court’s denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” Commonwealth v. La-Monte, 859 A.2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. RatsamySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API