Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant Thomas Brown appeals the judgment of sentence for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance (PWID) on grounds that: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress; and 2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. 1 We affirm.
¶ 2 “Our standard of review in addressing a challenge to a trial court’s denial of a suppression motion is limited to determining whether the factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” Commonwealth v. La-Monte, 859 A.2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In the Interest of D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. RatsamySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.