Legal Opinion

Byker v. Rice

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1984No. 83-833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHLEGEL, Judge.

Defendants appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs in this action to quiet title to an abandoned railroad right of way. Defendants claim that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding the ownership of adjoining land at the time of abandonment of the right of way, and regarding defendants’ claim of estoppel.

I. Summary Judgment — Propriety. Rule 237(c) of the Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure states the rule for determining a motion for summary judgment as follows:(c) Motion and proceedings thereon.... The judgment sought shall be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Swets Motor Sales, Inc. v. PruisnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Schulte v. MauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Chadek v. AlberhaskySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Davis v. ComitoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Met-Coil Systems Corp. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. McKinley v. Waterloo RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. AMCO Insurance Co. v. StammerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987
  4. Notelzah, Inc. v. DestivalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Pappas v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API