Legal Opinion

AMCO Insurance Co. v. Stammer

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1987No. 86-19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff in this declaratory judgment action, AMCO Insurance Company, is the insurer on a casualty policy covering the home of defendants, Randy and Rhonda Stammer. The policy extends to fire loss but does “not provide coverage for any insured who has intentionally concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstance relating to this insurance.” Both Randy and Rhonda qualify as an “insured” within the policy. On June 12, 1983, fire extensively damaged the Stammers’ home and its contents. All parties agree that the fire was the result of arson. On October…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bates v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Bradshaw v. Wakonda ClubCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  3. Khan v. Heritage Property ManagementCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
  4. Hanna v. Fleetguard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  5. Lindaman v. BodeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API