Legal Opinion

Notelzah, Inc. v. Destival

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 23, 1992No. 91-407PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Plaintiff purchased abandoned right of way from a railroad. Defendants, who are adjacent landowners, appeal from a decree quieting title in the plaintiff. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The disputed land is in Hazleton, Iowa. It was purchased by the Burlington, Cedar Rapids and Minnesota Railroad (BCRMR) in 1872. A number of deeds, some of them labeled “deed for right of way’’ and some labeled “warranty deed,” were involved. The property was later acquired by the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co. (CRIPR), which operated the railroad line until the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Spatuzza and James CozzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Weigel v. WeigelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Hawk v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Jacobs v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. Hoover Nature Trail, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
  2. Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Notelzah, Inc. v. DestivalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Phipps v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Louis A. Burgess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API