Legal Opinion

Davis v. Comito

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 21, 1973No. 55177PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, Justice.

This appeal by defendant, William J. Comito, stems from a summary judgment for John F. Davis, plaintiff, in a law action seeking judgment on Comito’s promissory note executed September 10, 1964 and delivered to plaintiff December 11. It presents the question whether there was a genuine issue as to any material fact generated by the record before the trial court thus precluding it from finding Davis was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rule 237(c), Rules of Civil Procedure, provides in part: “* * * The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Sherwood v. NissenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Bauer v. Stern Finance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Gruener v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NottgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Bates v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. McCarney v. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API