Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ackerina

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 20, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

Petitioner was a witness to a will under which her father, the decedent’s brother, was named sole beneficiary. Three other brothers were disinherited. The sole beneficiary predeceased the testatrix, and the petitioner claims a right to succeed to her father’s bequest under the statute preventing lapse (Decedent Estate Law, § 29), as his only descendant. The respondents claim that her interest as substituted legatee is vitiated by operation of section 27 of the Decedent Estate Law, which provides that if any person shall be a subscribing witness to the execution of a will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of a Paper Alleged to Be the Last Will and Testament of BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In re BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re the Awarding of Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed, upon the Estate of GogginNew York Surrogate's Court · 1904
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MoyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  5. In re the Estate of GeorgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. In re the Estate of FrachtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  3. Gower v. WinelanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API