Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fracht

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bertram R. Gelfand, S.

In this probate proceeding, two of the three attesting witnesses to the propounded instrument are named in the instrument as primary beneficiaries. The third witness is a sister who is a contingent beneficiary. A citation was issued to the interested parties to show cause why the court should not determine who, pursuant to EPTL 3-3.2, is entitled to the dispositions contained in the instrument in favor of the attesting witnesses.

*666Although in the majority of cases, the question of whether a disposition to an attesting witness is void is left for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. In Re the Accounting of MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. In re the Estate of AckerinaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ValenteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MoreaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996
  2. In re MarsloeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API