Legal Opinion

Gower v. Winelander

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1980No. Civ. No. 47218PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

This case requires us to determine whether a subscribing witness to a will who is named in the will as a beneficiary becomes “disinterested” within the meaning of Probate Code section 51 by filing a disclaimer of her interest after the testatrix’ death. While our own policy preferences tempt us to an affirmative answer, we feel constrained by existing law to hold that a disclaimer is ineffective for that purpose.

I

Geneve Parsons executed her will on May 3, 1976. Three persons signed the will as attesting witnesses: Evelyn Nielson, respondent Marie Gower, and Bob Warda, a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Estate of RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Martin v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API