Legal Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Ficker
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 18, 1990No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 11, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC), acting through Bar Counsel, charged Robin K.A. Ficker (Ficker) with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility (for acts that occurred on or before 31 December 1986) and of the Rules of Professional Conduct (for acts that occurred thereafter). 1 Pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 b, we referred the matter to Judge Peter Messitte of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The charges against Ficker related to three sets of circumstances, the first involving Angela A. Daley, the second…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.