Buckner v. . Maynard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaRKSON, J.
We think the only question for our decision is whether the deed from James Buckner and Sarah Ann Buckner vested a fee-simple title in Eller Riddle, or an estate as tenants iii common in Eller Riddle and her children. We think an estate vested as tenants in common in Eller Riddle and her children.
There is no question under our authorities that standing alone the language under the witnesseth clause “do grant, bargain, sell and convey to the said Eller Biddle and children her bodily heirs and assigns” would convey a fee simple. Harrington v. Grimes, 163 N. C., 76.
In the Harrington case, supra,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Puckett v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Acker v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Martin v. . KnowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Harrington v. . GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byrd v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Matheson v. American Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941