Acker v. . Pridgen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from O. H. Allen, J., at January Term, 1912, of New HaNOveR, on case agreed. Civil action to recover possession of a certain lot of land described in tbe pleadings. From a judgment for plaintiffs tbe defendant appeals. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Brown.
1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.
On 12 August, 1882, Moses Moore conveyed tbe land in controversy to Jobn Pridgen and wife, Peggie, tbe premises being, “unto tbe parties of tbe second part and to tbeir beirs and assigns forever”; tbe babendum being: “To bave and to bold tbe said property unto Jobn Pridgen and wife, Peggie, during tbe term of tbeir natural lives; and after tbeir death to Marion Pridgen, Ellen Beatty, and any other child or children that may be begotten by him at any time during bis marriage with Peggie Pridgen, bis wife, to them and tbeir assigns forever.”
Peggie Pridgen died and Jobn Pridgen married tbe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Hill v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Moore v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Beacom v. AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.