Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Cariker
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1963No. Civ. 7083PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
This action for reformation of a deed, dated and executed July 9, 1936, was instituted on February 8, 1960, by E. D. Seymour and his wife Bessie A. Seymour, plaintiffs, cross-defendants and respondents, against Sarah Cariker as administratrix of the estate of J. D. Cariker, deceased. The property involved was an 80-acre parcel of land in Yucca Valley. The record comes to us only on the clerk’s transcript. According to the complaint, J. D. Cariker delivered a deed to his son-in-law, plaintiff E. D. Seymour, to:
“The East Eighty (80) acres of the North East One Hundred Sixty Acres (160) of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pond v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Lundgren v. LundgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966