Legal Opinion

Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Larson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1946No. 30016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by commercial waterway district No. 1, under the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 812 [P.P.C. § 55-5] et seq. (unlawful detainer statutes) against C. J. Larson and wife.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff was at all times therein mentioned a municipal corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington (Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 9724 to 9776-10 [P.P.C. § 431-1 to 431-31]), and that at all times therein mentioned plaintiff was the owner of the property therein described.

It is further alleged that on November 8, 1945, and for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hill v. NewellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gore v. AlticeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Erz v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harris v. Hylebos Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Priestley Mining & Milling Co. v. Lenox Mining & Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. Permanente Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API