Legal Opinion
Harris v. Hylebos Industries, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1973No. 42087PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The appellant is the owner of a parcel of platted first class tidelands 1 purchased by his predecessors in title from the State of Washington. The property, which embraces approximately 12 acres, is located in an area of the city of Tacoma which is zoned for heavy industry and abuts on the west on Hylebos Waterway, 2 which has been dredged through a slough formed by Hylebos Creek. As a consequence of this dredging, Hylebos Waterway is used for navigation by ocean-going vessels.
In the past, the appellant has used his property mainly for the storage and movement of logs. At one comer is an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Port of Seattle v. Oregon & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- City of Renton v. Scott Pacific Terminal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Draper MacHine Works, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Lloyd v. MontecuccoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Hood Canal Sand And Gravel v. Peter GoldmarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.