Charles Brown & Sons v. White Lunch Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
This is an action brought for the rescission of a contract and the recovery of the purchase price of certain stock of the defendant corporation purchased by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the hardware business in the city of San Francisco, and the defendant corporation is engaged in operating a chain of restaurants. The contract between the parties, which plaintiff seeks to rescind, is evidenced by two letters, one from the defendant to plaintiff and the other from plaintiff to defendant. The letters are as follows:
“April 11, 1922.
“Messrs. Chas.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Fowler Utilities Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Los Angeles Immigration & Cooperative Ass'n v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Jules Levy & Bro. v. A. Mautz & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hardison v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Brawley v. Crosby Research Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.