Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Mauzey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 22, 1926No. 6 Div. 627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The statement of the case contains count 1 of the complaint. With minor variations counts 2 and 3 alleged plaintiff’s (appellee’s) cause of action substantially as in count 1. Defendant complains that the declaration did not adequately inform it as to the location of the drainage ' sewer opening into which she fell. We think that reference to the complaint will refute this ground of demurrer. Nor was the complaint demurrable on other grounds. Defendant insists that it would impose upon it a duty not exacted by law, because it avers that “said drainage sewer was without bars, ' grating, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brannon v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. McKinnon v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. City of Birmingham v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. City of Birmingham v. PrickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Sheehan v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. McCaleb v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API